IELTS Writing Task 2 – Essay
Do you know the advantages of such a system and do you believe that this is a thing that most cities should adopt? Give cause of your answer and can include any examples that are relevant your knowledge or experience.
Driving is a pay someone to write my paper status that is real among many people. Cars and private vehicles have made human life easier and convenient to a great extent. However in this metropolitan age, while experiencing comfort travelling, we also face the difficulty of traffic congestion. A lot of countries are taking steps that are efficient improve pollution levels by imposing many restrictions on vehicles. The prohibition of private cars alone is not a long term solution as it requires varied methods like upgrading public transport facilities and the infrastructure of these metropolia in my perspective.
Undoubtedly, personal cars are comparatively suitable than public transportation, and also the almost all the locals are accepting this challenge of compulsory use of public transit. Many European cities, such as London, have begun implementing outright bans so driving around Central London will charge a congestion fee that is heavy. Therefore, half of the roads in London happens to be declared as ‘pedestrian priority’ zone. Besides London, Paris has also applied the no personal vehicle rule by which they have banned cars created before 1997 and also initiate people to use go car-free on weekends by using bicycles for travelling. These efforts have greatly reduced vehicle emission in lot of parts of the entire world.
However, there is certainly opposite side associated with coin. Completely restricting the four-wheelers from the city centers would negatively affect the economy that is overall of country. A few drawbacks of this scheme are that it would restrict the freedom of this social people by controlling their fundamental right. It could also affect the disabled category as they have to manage the inconvenience of taking trains and buses that doesn’t have any special facilities for them. Banning vehicles that are private city centers can prove to be heavy on people’s pocket too.
From my own standpoint, banning private cars completely is certainly not a idea that is wise control environmental issues. Therefore, the government can encourage to use efficient means of public transportation. They need to also spread the awareness to persuade the individuals to car-pool by restricting odd and even license plates on alternating days. Cities like Madrid and Oslo are successful in eliminating vehicle emission and diesel that is taking off their roads.
Celebrity endorsement has become very popular. Even brands that are mediocre after this trend for promoting or launching a product. Certainly, product endorsement is a conventional and marketing that is highly effective to spread brand awareness. Nonetheless, in addition bears certain risks as well. In this essay I will discuss both advantages and disadvantages of celebrity branding.
To start with the advantages of celebrities advertising for different companies, building trust may be the main positive. A large number of people evaluate these celebrities as his or her role model and trust them. Therefore, they find an item authentic and acceptable if their celebrity that is favorite is it. Furthermore, it gets easier for anyone to keep in mind or recall the advertisement if a famous personality promotes it .
Taking a look at the opposite side of the argument, the predominant disadvantage may be the cost taking part in this activity that is promotional. Companies that are in a position to spend a amount that is huge of on advertisements care the largest beneficiaries of this practice. On the other hand, financially incapacitated companies cannot sign a hollywood to promote their brands. Hence, regardless of making quality products their business suffers. Sometimes, such marketing practices can adversely affect the goodwill of a business. I am talking about to express that negative publicity of the celebrity has a direct effect on the revenue of the company. Declining stardom of a public figure can bring an amazing drop in company’s overall sales.
Concluding both the sides, celebrity endorsement is definitely a marketing strategy that is powerful. It helps in market expansion. Moreover, it could positively impact the purchase and perception intentions associated with the customers. I think, the advantages in terms of reliability and trust outweigh any drawbacks.
Do the advantages are thought by you of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
Museums are a great source of knowledge in societies. Many museums charge a hefty amount as an entrance fee, however others try not to. There are a few people who argue that entry of the institutes that are educational be cost free to serve the society better. I really believe that charging a amount that is nominal an entrance fee could be beneficial in several ways.
Undeniably, charging a amount that is hefty visitors has some adverse effects. Firstly, it deprives people of lack in possibility to access most of the information that is vital history, art and science. Secondly, paying an entrance fee could be the major factor to impact the interest in a museum over others, despite having many artifacts. Many citizens will begin flinching from visiting these institutions because of the entrance charges. This could eventually put the existence of museums on stake.
Despite having a drawbacks that are few entrance charges could be beneficial in several ways. Most prominently, museums authorities can use the entrance fee amount for all purposes. For instance, time-to-time renovation cost, electricity charges, safety and security cost to properly operate these institutions. Moreover, it has been seen in the past that lots of times the national governments fail to meet with the requirement of these institutions. However by charging an entrance fee, museums might have their own revenue to help keep the area neat and appealing to get more visitors.
To close out, charging entrance fee for museums can attract negative remarks from some individuals. I believe posing a nominal amount on visitors may be beneficial in many ways for museums.
Come up with the topic that is following
Nowadays, parents are allowing their children to utilize tablets and smartphones to improve learning.
Do the advantages of the development outweigh the disadvantages?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example from your own knowledge or experience.
In past times few years, modern technology is actually available to society at large. Increasingly more parents are relying on computers and laptops to create their children learn new things. In this article, I shall discuss both merits and demerits of utilizing technology for learning.
Let’s start by looking at the advantages of using tablets and smartphones. The positive that is main that it supports social interaction and enhances communication skills. Put simply, children can easily relate to their friends and family. Moreover, because of their advanced features, compact devices like smart phones are becoming more than simply a calling device. They could be useful for entertainment and learning as well. Children obtain the possiblity to learn through various educational applications. Furthermore, doing offers on smartphones, increases their mental stimulation and concentration.
Looking at one other region of the argument, excessive use of electronic devices makes children devoid of physical activity. It not only hampers their personal growth but also physical development. Another issue is that, children prefer isolation and become hooked on the unit. As a total result, it adversely affects their interpersonal along with social skills.
Considering both the relative sides, we are able to conclude that balance is the key. Although, smartphones and tablets have multiple benefits, reading and other physical workouts are also required for children’s overall development. I think, the educational advantages of choosing electronic devices outweigh any drawbacks.